RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fractures of the capitellum are rare in children. The purpose of this study was to report fracture characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of pediatric capitellar fractures at a single children's hospital. We also aimed to update the classification of these fractures based on a large sample size by revising the Murthy (Boston) classification. METHODS: In a retrospective study at a single tertiary care children's hospital, fractures of the capitellum in patients below 18 years of age were queried and reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, imaging, treatment, outcomes, and complications. Three surgeons reviewed all imaging to classify the fractures and assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (25 male) with capitellar fractures with a mean age of 11.7±3.7 years were identified. Seven fractures did not belong to an existing type and were grouped into a new type IV capitellar fracture, defined as LCL avulsions with extension to the articular surface of the capitellum. We found good to excellent inter-rater and intrarater reliability for the new classification system. Our raters believed that cross-sectional imaging was essential to classifying fractures in 84% of the cases. Thirty-three of 44 patients underwent early surgical intervention, with favorable outcomes. Five patients presented late with substantial elbow contracture and malunion and were treated surgically with the excision of the fragment. CONCLUSIONS: The new classification of pediatric capitellar fractures is more comprehensive and offers good to excellent reliability. We found excellent outcomes in the majority of cases with early diagnosis and management, but substantial risk for complications with missed and delayed diagnosis. Malunion and subsequent loss of ROM were the most common presentations of a missed diagnosis, which can be surgically treated with favorable outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective cohort study.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the rate of distal ulnar growth arrest following physeal fracture and to identify specific risk factors for premature physeal closure. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with a distal ulnar physeal fracture was performed at a single United States children's hospital. Patients without 6-month follow-up were excluded. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were abstracted. Fractures were classified by the Salter-Harris (SH) system. All follow-up radiographs were reviewed for changes in ulnar variance or signs of premature physeal arrest. RESULTS: Fifty-six children with distal ulnar physeal fracture at a mean age of 10.7±3.3 years were included with a mean follow-up of 1.9 years. The most common fracture pattern was a SH II (52.7%), versus SH I (29.1%), SH III (9.1%), and SH IV (9.1%). Of displaced fractures (41.1%), the mean translation was 40.2±38.3% the and mean angulation was 24.8±20.9 degrees. Eleven fractures (19.6%) demonstrated radiographic signs of growth disturbance, including 3 patients (5.4%) with growth disturbance but continued longitudinal growth and 8 patients (14.3%) with complete growth arrest. The average ulnar variance was -3.4 mm. Three patients underwent subsequent surgical reconstruction including ulnar lengthening with an external fixator, distal ulna completion epiphysiodesis with distal radius epiphysiodesis, and ulnar corrective osteotomy. Patients with displaced fractures and SH III/IV fractures were more likely to develop a growth disturbance (34.8% vs. 3.2%, P =0.003; 50.0% vs. 11.1%, P =0.012, respectively). Children with less than 2 years of skeletal growth remaining at the time of injury had a higher risk of growth disturbance (46.2% vs. 9.5%, P =0.007). CONCLUSIONS: SH III and IV fractures are more common injury patterns in the distal ulna compared with the distal radius. Growth disturbance or growth arrest occurs in ~20% of distal ulnar physeal fractures. Displaced fractures, intra-articular fractures, fractures requiring open reduction, and older children are at increased risk of distal ulnar growth arrest and should be followed more closely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV--case series.
